Early Voting and Election Day Schedules

EARLY VOTING INFORMATION
Melissa City Hall, 3411 Barker Avenue, Melissa, Texas or ANY Collin County early voting location. http://www.cityofmelissa.com/melissa/notice_of_early_voting_May_14_2011.pdf

Monday May 2, 2011 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Tuesday May 3, 2011 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Wednesday May 4, 2011 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Thursday May 5, 2011 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Friday May 6, 2011 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Saturday May 7, 2011 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Monday May 9, 2011 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Tuesday May 10, 2011 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.

ELECTION DAY
Saturday, May 14, 2011 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Election Day Location(s) of Polling Places:
City of Melissa City Hall
3411 Barker Avenue
Melissa, Texas
and
Collin County Election Office
2010 Redbud Blvd., Ste. #102
McKinney, Texas

Note: City and School District voters may vote at any of the additional Early Voting locations open under full contract services with the Collin County Elections Administrator.

Documentation Of Weideman Peformance On MIEDC

Earlier, I mentioned that Sharon Weideman was a paid employee of the Melissa Industrial Economic Development Board but did not perform the functions of the job. Ms Weideman was paid $18,000/year for a 20 hour per week position. One of Ms. Weideman’s duties for the MIEDC was to pick up the mail at the post office.

I had mentioned the Post office had put a notice on the door of the MIEDC office warning that the post office box would be canceled if the bill was not paid. The note was put on the door on a Friday and on the following Wednesday a city employee picked up the note. The city employee finding the note was not Sharon Weideman. A city employee went to the Post Office to find that the Post Office box had been canceled and that all the mail had been returned to sender.

Many have asked me if this is a rumor or if it is a fact. I have attached below documentation that clearly this did happen. This documentation is in the city archives and in the public domain. Weideman was removed from her position on MIEDC in 2009.

Click on the images below to enlarge and click again to magnify.

Former Melissa Mayor David Dorman Accuses Mayor Pro Tem Sharon Weideman of fraud, corruption and abuse of power

http://www.heralddemocrat.com/am/anna-melissa-texas-news/Tribune-2010-Year-in-Review

Former Melissa mayor David Dorman read a prepared statement at a Melissa City Council meeting in which he accused Mayor Pro Tem Sharon Weideman of fraud, corruption and abuse of power and called for an investigation in September 2010.

The official City minutes shows Mr. Dorman on the agenda but did not make his remarks a part of the record.
http://www.cityofmelissa.com/government/docs/MINUTES_09_14_2010.pdf

Melissa City Council removes all five members of the city's 4A board

The Melissa City Council removed all five members of the city's 4A board in a move that an ex-councilman said was entirely politically motivated. The council later named itself as the interim 4A board.

http://www.heralddemocrat.com/am/anna-melissa-texas-news/Tribune-2010-Year-in-Review

http://www.cityofmelissa.com/government/docs/MINUTES_08_17_2010.pdf

Motion was made by Bill Farmer and seconded by Kim Youngblood to remove all board members from the Melissa Industrial and Economic Development Corporation and instructed Jason Little to
revise the MIEDC bylaws and bring those forward at the next regular City Council Meeting. Mr. Farmer thanked the members of the board for their hard work and dedication.

Melissa Council Removes All 4A Board Members

http://www.amtrib.com/am/anna-melissa-texas-news/Melissa-Council-Removes-All-4A-Board-Members

The Melissa City Council voted to dissolve the membership of the city's Industrial and Economic Development (4A) Board.

The removed 4A board members included Chairman Jim Luscombe, former councilman Stan Mercer, Steve Rodriguez, Dr. Lawrence Silver and Michael Moore.

Anna Melissa Tribune Letter To The Editor--August 2010

There seems to have been a problem with a Melissa council member paying her property taxes for the last 10 years. A concerned citizen sent a letter to the City of Melissa in February, 2010 that stated that Sharon Weideman, Melissa’s current Mayor Pro Tem, had built house in her backyard. The letter said that when Ms. Weideman applied for the building permit, she said the permit was for a garage that would have a value of about $10,000. In fact, what Ms. Weideman actually built was a residential dwelling with a value closer to $100,000. You can check this on the Collin County website, cad account # R-3597-000-0030-1.

This dwelling has a bedroom, bath, full kitchen, living room and game room. For the last 10 years, however, Mayor Pro Tem Weideman has been paying property taxes on a structure valued at $10,000. In her role as city council member for the last three years, Ms. Weideman has been making important decisions regarding our city taxes—taxes that affect every resident in Melissa. It doesn’t seem quite fair that she’s been cheating on her own property taxes while making government decisions on taxation issues for our city. I was lead to believe that our present Mayor Greer told the Melissa Police not to investigate this when the letter arrived at their office.

There are other curious inconsistencies in Mayor Pro Tem Weideman’s ethical make up.

For example, when she first ran (unsuccessfully) for a city council seat against incumbent Randy Kaiser, there was a ‘Meet Randy Kaiser’ event to be held on a certain date in a certain subdivision in Melissa. Ms. Weideman called the developer of the subdivision and said she was calling from the office of the Mayor of Melissa. She asked the developer to cancel the “Meet Randy Kaiser” event. The developer declined her request. Undaunted by her failed ploy to quash her opponent’s campaign efforts, Ms. Weideman decided to post her own campaign signs illegally along the roadway to Mr. Kaiser’s event.

Another example of unprofessional behavior by Ms. Weideman occurred when she was first elected to the city council. Ms. Weideman had a hissyfit and refused to speak to the head of the City of Melissa Chamber of Commerce during her first six months she sat on the council. At that point in time she was a paid employee of the Melissa Industrial Economic Development Board. The Economic Development Board is a critical part of the prosperity of a growing community like Melissa. Economic development serves all the residents of Melissa by expanding our tax base. All members of the Economic Development Board should be friendly and inviting, courteous and professional in all dealings with other city boards, and especially with residential and commercial prospects and newcomers to Melissa. In tandem with the Economic Development Board, our young City of Melissa Chamber of Commerce must also encourage commercial parties who show interest in establishing their businesses in Melissa. If a city council member refuses to speak to the head of her own Chamber of Commerce would you want to move your business to Melissa?

Ms. Weideman works hard. She earned her license as a real estate agent while she was still working for the MIEDC. The last year Ms Weideman worked for the MIEDC she was given an office in the city center. Her duties as a paid employee of the MIEDC included being in this office during the mornings on weekdays so that anyone interested in Melissa as a possible new home for their business would have a knowledgeable representative of the city to speak with about their interests and business. Sadly, Ms. Weideman did not go to her office for weeks at a time. On the days she did go to the office in the morning she was conducting her real estate business and not the job the city was paying her to do. We have to wonder what business opportunities Melissa lost while Ms. Weideman was working so hard to list and sell houses for personal profit.

Another of Ms. Weideman’s duties for the MIEDC was to pick up the mail at the post office. Evidently, Ms. Weideman was simply too busy to do this. The post office called the city and complained that the MIEDC mailbox was so full that they could not put one more letter in it—the mail had not been picked up for 30 days. That day the city dispatched someone else to empty the MIEDC’s mail.

Sometime later, the post office also had to put a notice on the door of the MIEDC office warning that the post office box would be canceled if the bill was not paid. The notice was left on the door on a Friday. It was not picked up until the following Wednesday, but not by Ms. Weideman. The first notice was sitting untouched in the PO box that was crammed full of mail which had once again accumulated for 30 days.

While working as a paid employee of the MIEDC, Ms. Weideman used both City of Melissa (MIEDC) and Chamber of Commerce supplies to print flyers for her Real Estate listings. I suppose many of us have done this: used the paper and copier at work for personal projects, and it’s never an honest or ethical thing to do. And when you do it using the paper and copier that your neighbors pay for with their taxes, it’s particularly dishonest and unethical. Ms Weideman was paid $18,000/year for a 20 hour per week position. Not bad pay for a part time position. Really good pay if you don’t do anything and can use the office supplies for your own business. I don’t know a real estate agent in Melissa that would turn this job down.

The façade of ethics and professional conduct crumbled a bit more for Ms. Weideman when she tried to do a little arm-twisting with a residential developer. She misused her position on the city council to pressure this developer to list his properties with her as the real estate agent.

Unfortunately, in my observation, Ms. Weideman falls short of the standards we hope our elected representatives will uphold. Everyone is busy, and no one is perfect. We make mistakes, apologize, learn from them, and move on. We endeavor to be humble and refrain from casting the first stone. But every now and then, somebody has to throw a stone to defend his town and all good citizens from lies and deceit.

City of Melissa Community Strategic Planning Retreat

The final report of the City of Melissa Community Strategic Planning Retreat

http://www.cityofmelissa.com/docs/Melissa_Final_Report_Published_3_1_10.pdf

Dr. Sherman Wyman and a graduate Management of Economic Development class in the School of Urban and Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Arlington to design and facilitate a strategic planning retreat for Melissa government and business leaders. The retreat took place at Melissa Ridge Intermediate School on November 12, 2009 with twenty seven (27) community leaders in attendance. The retreat was preceded by an environmental scan with anticipated retreat participants including the mayor, city council members, and various Melissa business and community leaders.

The report includes an introduction, a review of the retreat process used in Melissa, postretreat observations of the facilitators, and a series of appendices that contain the data produced

by and for the retreat participants.

An important summary:

Commitment and Follow Through Strategic plans are not self-implementing. It is for that reason that strong emphasis was given at the retreat to the necessity of follow-through and progress monitoring. Success depends on an unqualified commitment from the city council, the chamber of commerce, Melissa Industrial and Economic Development Corporation (4A) and Melissa Community and Economic Development Corporation (4B) boards, the school board and other community institutions to follow-through on the strategic priorities and specific actions adopted at the retreat. This might be done by forming a Strategic Planning Action Committee or similar body chaired by a prominent member of the community. Members might be selected from the institutions represented at the retreat and others who must be involved for sustained progress. The committee could meet bi-monthly to review implementation progress with the strategic priorities and related actions approved at the retreat. A simple monitoring sheet can be used to track implementation progress and encourage a discussion of what is going well, not so well and what should be added, deleted or changed. Information on progress should be made public. The committee also might propose modifications to the strategic plan in response to emergent community needs not foreseen during the planning process.